Officers stated alert was unintentionally triggered and there was no fireplace
Time flies if you’re on the highway
Critics nervous about potential intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard’s reward for overseas adversaries doubtless have an insurmountable drawback: a soon-to-be commander in chief who shares the identical and much more excessive views.
The previous Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii, now a Republican whom President-elect Donald Trump has picked as his director of nationwide intelligence, is underneath fireplace from each events for her years of sympathetic feedback about Russian dictator Vladimir Putin and his allies, together with just lately deposed Syrian dictator Bashar Assad.
“I’ve acquired plenty of questions on Ms. Gabbard. However that’s why we now have an advise and consent course of, that’s why we now have these hearings,” Virginia’s Mark Warner, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee and can grow to be the rating Democrat within the new Congress, informed reporters final month. “A few of these claims of her ties to those adversaries like Russia and Syria, there’s acquired to be each information and rationalization of that.”
Trump’s personal former nationwide safety adviser, John Bolton, mentioned Gabbard’s appointment would please America’s foes. “Her judgment is nonexistent, and the concept someway she can be put in command of this vital perform must be giving our adversaries in Moscow and Beijing plenty of reduction,” he informed CNN.
Trump aides didn’t reply to HuffPost’s queries about Gabbard.
Since Republicans gained 4 Senate seats in final month’s election to take management of the chamber and Vice President-elect J.D. Vance is offered to solid a possible tie-breaking vote, Trump can afford to lose not more than three Republican senators and nonetheless win Gabbard’s affirmation.
North Carolina Republican Thom Tillis mentioned Gabbard must be ready for a grilling. “There’s going to be powerful questions which are requested, and there must be good solutions for them,” he mentioned. “That’s how this place works round right here, the nominees simply must be ready to reply inquiries to the satisfaction of the committee.”
South Carolina’s Lindsey Graham met with Gabbard on Monday and mentioned afterward he nonetheless has extra to listen to from her.
“I don’t suppose she’s a Russian agent. She could have a distinct view of overseas coverage than I do; that’s not disqualifying,” the Republican mentioned, stating that Gabbard didn’t help the USA’ 2020 assassination of Iranian army chief Qasem Soleimani. “I’m going to ask her some questions on her pondering — she objected to killing Soleimani.”
AP Photograph/Julia Demaree Nikhinson
At subject are Gabbard’s statements over the previous decade which have aligned with propaganda being pushed by Putin’s Russia. In 2015, after Putin started bombing hospitals in Syria to assist Assad put down a rise up in opposition to his autocratic rule, Gabbard equated these preventing Assad with the terrorists who took down the World Commerce Heart and attacked the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.
“Al-Qaeda attacked us on 9/11 and should be defeated. Obama received’t bomb them in Syria. Putin did,” she wrote in a social media publish.
That very same 12 months, in a go to to the Syrian border in her position as a member of the Home Armed Companies Committee, she questioned three younger women who suffered extreme burns in a kind of air raids, asking how they knew it was Assad or Russia that had bombed them, and never Islamic State terrorists — though ISIS by no means had any airplanes.
Two years later, she visited Assad personally, whilst the USA authorities continued to sentence him for utilizing chemical weapons on his personal residents. “Let the Syrian folks themselves decide their future, not the USA, not some overseas nation,” Gabbard mentioned, amplifying a Russian declare that the US had instigated the rebellion in opposition to Assad.
Extra just lately, she has questioned US help for Ukraine’s efforts to repel the invasion Putin launched to take over his neighbour. In a video she posted to social media in 2022, she repeated the conspiracy principle being superior by Russia that the USA was secretly funding bioweapons labs in Ukraine.
Adam Schiff, the previous Home intelligence chair and soon-to-be Democratic senator from California, posted a press release quickly after Trump introduced Gabbard’s appointment: “Tulsi Gabbard combines a scarcity of expertise with poor judgment, not a superb mixture in somebody who would lead our intelligence companies. If our allies don’t imagine she may be trusted with intelligence, they are going to cease sharing. And the American folks will probably be much less protected.”
But whereas Gabbard’s statements and views are alarming a bipartisan array of intelligence consultants, they’re according to these of Trump, who has been at odds with American intelligence companies since they concluded in 2016 that Russia had helped him win the presidency that 12 months over Democrat Hillary Clinton.
Trump famously declared, in a summit he staged with Putin in Helsinki in 2018, that he believed Putin over his personal intelligence companies on the matter of the 2016 election. He quickly afterward started making an attempt to show a associated conspiracy principle, additionally disseminated by Russia, that it was Ukraine that had tried to assist Clinton win in 2016. Trump’s efforts alongside these strains finally led to his first impeachment when he tried to extort Ukraine’s chief into asserting an investigation into Joe Biden, the Democrat Trump most feared as a 2020 opponent.
When Putin invaded Ukraine in early 2022, Trump known as him a “genius” for doing so, whilst the USA and its NATO allies rallied behind Ukraine.
In any occasion, if Trump’s transition group is nervous about Gabbard’s historical past of repeating Russian conspiracy theories, it exhibits no signal of it. On Monday, it launched a letter signed by veterans who help Gabbard.
Among the many signatories: Michael Flynn, a hero of the pro-Trump QAnon cult, and Jack Posobiec, a right-wing agitator greatest identified for pushing the QAnon conspiracy principle {that a} Washington, D.C., pizzeria was truly a headquarters for satanic little one homicide.
#Tulsi #Gabbards #ProPutin #Views #Alarm #Intel #Specialists #Mirror #Trumps
HuffPost UK – Athena2 – All Entries (Public)
#Tulsi #Gabbards #ProPutin #Views #Alarm #Intel #Specialists #Mirror #Trumps
S.V. Date , 2024-12-10 06:50:00
The talk round whether or not fluoride ought to be added to faucet water shouldn’t be new.
The apply, which is geared toward decreasing tooth decay, has been ongoing for 60 years.
However since fluoride toothpaste grew to become extra broadly accessible across the Seventies, extra questions have been raised about whether or not including it to the ingesting provide continues to be crucial.
And with Donald Trump’s well being secretary choose Robert F Kennedy Jr saying he would ban it, the difficulty has entered public debate but once more.
Regardless of RFK being well-known for his outlandish views on public well being, it appears the fluoridation challenge is not one that may be completely dismissed.
One research within the US has linked fluoride to a decreasing of kids’s IQs, whereas one other within the UK has questioned its total effectiveness when added to water.
So what’s fluoride, what do specialists say – and what is the story within the UK?
What’s fluoride and what does it do?
It is a pure mineral present in rocks, which leaches into soil, rivers and lakes.
It helps dental well being by strengthening the tooth enamel, making it extra immune to tooth decay, and in addition reduces the quantity of acid the micro organism in your enamel produce, based on the Oral Well being Basis.
Fluoride is understood to be significantly useful for kids’s enamel, as previous research have prompt ingesting it in the course of the interval of tooth improvement makes the enamel extra immune to later acid assaults and subsequent improvement of tooth decay.
Dr Kunal Patel, who has been a non-public and NHS dentist for 15 years, informed Sky Information the good thing about fluoride is “drilled into” dental college students, including there are “scientifically confirmed advantages of getting fluoride inside your oral hygiene regime”.
Fluoride is basically a passive approach of defending your enamel, he says.
“In case you resolve to not use fluoride then the strategy of brushing your enamel, your flossing and different strategies of cleansing must be that a lot better,” he provides.
How can we get fluoride?
Virtually all water accommodates some naturally occurring fluoride, however it’s usually not sufficient to stop tooth decay.
Some areas do have water provides the place the quantity of fluoride is of course at a excessive degree – some extent that will likely be lined later.
We get hint quantities of fluoride from a lot of our foods and drinks, however brewed tea specifically proves a giant supply as a result of tea vegetation take up fluoride from soil.
Most toothpastes now comprise fluoride to offer you further safety from decay.
When did including it to the water provide turn into a factor?
Many oral well being specialists consider including fluoride to water – an act referred to as fluoridation – is the simplest solution to broadly scale back dental issues, significantly in underprivileged areas.
The apply started in 1945 in Grand Rapids, Michigan, after scientists observed that individuals had much less tooth decay in areas with naturally larger fluoride ranges within the faucet water.
It was first added to the water provide in England in 1964, when a pilot scheme was launched in Birmingham.
Over time it has been rolled out to about 75% of America’s inhabitants, in comparison with about 10% of England.
The World Well being Group (WHO) estimates some 400 million folks in 25 nations are getting artificially fluoridated water, whereas about 50 million have naturally occurring fluoride on the identical degree as the synthetic schemes.
What’s the very best quantity of fluoride in water?
The WHO recommends a most degree of 1.5mg per litre.
In its pointers, it says the extent is geared toward making a center floor the place tooth decay is minimised, however the danger of dental fluorosis and skeletal fluorosis is simply too.
Dental fluorosis is a typical beauty situation attributable to ingesting an excessive amount of fluoride throughout tooth improvement, and may go away white flecks, spots or strains on enamel.
Skeletal fluorosis, a a lot rarer prevalence, is a continual metabolic bone and joint illness attributable to ingesting massive quantities of fluoride.
The UK authorities goals for fluoride ranges of 1mg per litre in ingesting water, whereas the extent of fluoride is saved at about 0.7mg per litre within the US.
Potential hazard to youngsters’s IQs
Fluoridation has been a contentious topic within the US, with greater than 100 lawsuits through the years attempting to eliminate it with out success, based on the American Fluoridation Society, an advocacy group.
And the anti-fluoride group Fluoride Motion Community says greater than 150 cities and counties throughout the US have voted to maintain fluoride out of public water programs or to cease including it.
However the motion in opposition to it actually gained momentum earlier this 12 months when a US authorities report concluded that fluoride in ingesting water at twice the really helpful restrict was linked with decrease IQ in youngsters.
The report, primarily based on an evaluation of beforehand revealed analysis, stated it reached its conclusion “with average confidence”.
It cited a 2019 research, revealed within the well-respected journal JAMA Pediatrics, which discovered that IQ ranges had been barely decrease in three and four-year-old youngsters whose moms had larger measures of fluoride of their urine after they had been pregnant.
A federal decide in California used the report back to order the nation’s Environmental Safety Company (EPA) to strengthen its laws on fluoridation in September, saying the present ranges had been posing an unreasonable danger to youngsters.
The decide confused that he was not concluding with certainty that fluoridated water endangered public well being, however moderately that it poses a danger.
Questions over fluoride’s effectiveness
Within the UK, whereas the federal government is reviewing plans to boost fluoride ranges for thousands and thousands and roll it out into extra areas of England, a serious evaluation has prompt fluoridation could solely have a “modest” profit.
Lecturers at Manchester, Dundee and Aberdeen universities in contrast 157 research wanting on the impact of fluoridation on the dental well being of communities.
When the federal government started including fluoride to faucet water, it decreased the variety of decayed, lacking or crammed enamel by two complete enamel on common amongst youngsters with their child enamel, researchers stated.
Nonetheless, as soon as fluoride toothpaste grew to become broadly accessible, that quantity declined.
Now, it’s equal to a discount of a “quarter of a tooth” that’s decayed, lacking or crammed, on common.
“Water fluoridation is just having a modest profit on dental caries, and people advantages could take years to be realised,” stated Professor Anne-Marie Glenny, of the College of Manchester, who co-authored the paper.
May it really be scrapped within the US?
Mr Kennedy Jr has claimed Mr Trump will push to take away fluoride from ingesting water on his first day in workplace, referring to it as “industrial waste” in an announcement on X.
He additionally claimed fluoride was related to arthritis, bone fractures, bone most cancers, neurodevelopmental problems and thyroid illness.
Whereas there have been research concerning a few of these claims, none of them have been conclusive.
After the feedback, Mr Trump informed Sky Information’ US associate NBC Information that whereas he had not spoken to his well being secretary choose about attempting to scrap fluoride but, “it sounds OK to me. it is attainable”.
The choice on whether or not or not add fluoride to water is in the end made by state and native well being authorities, so Mr Trump’s authorities can solely advise them to cease it.
‘It is about danger vs profit’
Stephen Peckham, professor of well being coverage on the College of Kent, beforehand led a research on fluoridation’s potential hyperlinks to hypothyroidism – an underactive thyroid – and is now a part of a analysis group investigating whether or not it may very well be inflicting IQ points inside the UK’s inhabitants.
He tells Sky Information he accepts fluoride will be useful, however provides it isn’t a necessity, particularly in water.
“We all know that ingested fluoride shouldn’t be an efficient approach of stopping tooth decay,” he says. “If you wish to have fluoride, put it in your toothbrush and clear your enamel with it. It must be utilized to the tooth and never swallowed.”
He says that whereas the profit is restricted, the kids’s IQ research carried out within the US highlights a necessity for warning.
“What we do know is that ingesting fluoride does have a neurologic, neurotoxic impact. What’s much less sure is at what degree of fluoride that begins.
“The decide is saying, effectively, in that case, should not we be extra cautious? And restrict specifically pregnant girls’s entry to fluoridated water or consumption of fluoridated water.
“And your most of fluoride will depend on how a lot you drink. So in the event you drink extra, you get extra.”
It is in regards to the “stability of danger and profit”, he says.
“But when there’s not a lot profit, ought to you have got any danger? The reply is not any, you should not.”
‘Persist with essentially the most disadvantaged areas’
Dr Kunal Patel, who owns six personal dental clinics in Surrey, together with one for kids solely, says fluoridation was “nice in a time the place there was much less schooling and fewer entry to fluoride in toothpaste”.
He provides that earlier than the IQ research got here out, he would have been glad to see fluoride being added to any space within the UK as a result of he’d have thought “anybody may gain advantage” with out there being any damaging results.
Now, he says, he thinks it is best to be “selective” and restrict fluoridating water “to the areas which might be struggling, the place it is extra rural or extra disadvantaged”.
Learn extra:
Unhealthy meals costing UK greater than £260bn a 12 months, report says
Cocoa or inexperienced tea may help you destress greater than high-fat meals
He offers the North West for instance, saying he just lately did a charity occasion there to advertise dental well being amongst younger folks, and it was “stunning” to see what number of of them didn’t even personal a toothbrush.
He says it is a “good thought” to increase to related areas of the UK the place dental well being is low – however thinks it could be a fair higher thought to supply toothpaste to varsities in such areas and improve their schooling concerning how finest to take care of their enamel.
“I believe schooling is the best way ahead extra so than fluoridated water.”
A Division of Well being and Social Care spokesperson informed Sky Information: “The primary purpose youngsters aged six to 10 find yourself in hospital is to have their rotting enamel pulled out.
“Water fluoridation at ranges permitted on this nation is a secure and efficient public well being measure that reduces tooth decay.
“Prevention is all the time higher than remedy, and this authorities is dedicated to serving to folks keep wholesome and holding youngsters out of hospital.”
Is your water being fluoridated?
About 330,000 folks stay in areas of England with naturally occurring fluoride in ingesting water, whereas round 5.8 million folks get a synthetic provide put in theirs.
It means some 10% of individuals in England stay in areas the place fluoride is added to the water, primarily within the West Midlands and the North East.
There is no such thing as a fluoridation in Wales, Scotland or Northern Eire.
Right here is the total record of areas receiving synthetic fluoridation in England, based on the British Fluoridation Society:
And right here is the record of areas getting the “optimum” quantity of fluoride naturally:
The place else might fluoride be added to water?
The Conservative authorities launched proposals to increase fluoridation schemes throughout the North East “due to the numerous and long-standing inequalities within the area” on the subject of dental well being.
A public session on the plans was launched in June and closed in July. Since Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour authorities gained the election, it has not been clear whether or not the plans are nonetheless being pursued.
These are the areas the federal government proposed extending the fluoride provide to:
