Common Music Group has fired again at Drake’s try and sue it over the discharge of Kendrick Lamar’s diss observe Not Like Us final 12 months.
The Canadian musician filed a lawsuit on Tuesday, accusing the corporate of defamation by permitting the music to be revealed, claiming it had unfold the “false and malicious narrative” that he’s a paedophile.
In response, Common, which has been Drake’s label for greater than a decade, stated: “Not solely are these claims unfaithful, however the notion that we’d search to hurt the popularity of any artist – not to mention Drake – is illogical.”
It additionally accused the star of making an attempt to “silence” Lamar by taking their rap battle to the courts.
“All through his profession, Drake has deliberately and efficiently used UMG to distribute his music and poetry to have interaction in conventionally outrageous back-and-forth ‘rap battles’ to specific his emotions about different artists,” the label stated.
“He now seeks to weaponize the authorized course of to silence an artist’s inventive expression and to hunt damages from [Universal] for distributing that artist’s music.”
In response to claims that Common had intentionally harmed Drake’s profession, the label famous it had “invested massively” in his music, serving to him “obtain historic business and private monetary success”.
“We now have not and don’t have interaction in defamation – towards any particular person,” the assertion concluded.
Drake’s lawsuit was filed on the US District Courtroom for the Southern District of New York on Wednesday, and marks the most recent chapter in his long-running feud with Lamar.
The pair butted heads on a collection of rap tracks final 12 months. In a single, Drake accused Lamar of home abuse. Lamar responded with Not Like Us, through which he characterised Drake and his entourage as “licensed paedophiles” who ought to “be registered and positioned on neighbourhood watch”.
In courtroom paperwork, Drake claimed that Common knew that Lamar’s lyrics have been false however “continued to fan the flames” of the controversy for revenue.
He claimed the label launched “a marketing campaign to create a viral hit” out of the music, and steered {that a} taking pictures at his Toronto mansion final Might was instantly linked to these actions.
Common, he stated, “selected company greed over the security and well-being of its artists”.
Nevertheless, the authorized case didn’t take goal at Lamar himself.
“This lawsuit will not be concerning the artist who created Not Like Us,” the courtroom paperwork stated.
“It’s, as a substitute, totally about UMG, the music firm that determined to publish, promote, exploit, and monetize allegations that it understood weren’t solely false, however harmful.”
#Common #fires #illogical #Drake #lawsuit
, 2025-01-16 10:30:00
